The Sabbath

Sacrifices & Feasts of the Old Testament collection. Listed among the moedim in Lev 23. Col 2:16-17 relegates it to shadow. Not commanded for Christians, deeply wise anyway. Although, Beale argues the strongest case the other way.

Requirements

Two Different Reasons

Sign of the Covenant

the Sabbath was the sign between Yahweh and Israel of the old covenant, as is clearly stated in Exodus 31:12-18. Covenants often have a physical sign associated with them. The rainbow was given as a physical sign of God's promise in his covenant with Noah. Circumcision was commanded as a physical sign… Similarly, the Sabbath is stipulated as a permanent sign between Yahweh and Israel.

ANE Background

in the Old Testament people work for their own benefit and provision, rather than to meet the needs of God or to do his work for him. When commanded to share the rest of God on the Sabbath, it is not to participate in it per se, but to recognize His work of bringing and maintaining order.

Sabbath as the Architecture of the Calendar

Jesus and the Sabbath

the frequency of healings might even suggest that Jesus very purposely chose to heal on the Sabbath. He did this not to shock people, not to break the law, not to show that the law was worn out and old-fashioned, but rather as a sign that the day of release had come… The Sabbath that the Messiah brought in was a day of release from the bondage of Satan… The old Sabbath rest was in fact a sign or type of the deeper Sabbath rest Jesus would bring.

Colossians 2:16-17

That Paul without any qualification can relegate Sabbaths to shadows certainly indicates that he does not see them as binding and makes it extremely unlikely that he could have seen the Christian first day as a continuation of the Sabbath.

there is no doubt that by the Lord Christ's coming the ceremonial part of this commandment was abolished… He is, I say, the true fulfillment of the Sabbath… This is not confined within a single day but extends throughout the whole course of our life, until, completely dead to ourselves, we are filled with the life of God.

Beale's Counter-Case

Beale argues for an ongoing Sabbath rooted not in the Mosaic covenant but in the creation ordinance of Gen 2:2-3, which precedes Sinai and therefore survives it.

Two Reasons Not to Follow Him

  1. His admission is decisive against him. Col 2:16 is an explicit text; Beale's reconstruction is an inference. Where the two conflict, the explicit text should govern.
  2. His best argument establishes weekly rhythm, not weekly obligation. Different claims. The church can meet on the first day because Christ rose on it (which is the actual reason - Acts 20:7; 1 Cor 16:2; Rev 1:10) without that meeting being a Sabbath in the covenantal sense.

Conclusion

Because Christ fulfills the typical aspect of the Sabbath, he does not render Sabbath keeping irrelevant. Although the people of God are no longer distinctive by their Sabbath keeping, most of the reasons for keeping the Sabbath are still valid. Though we are not under law, and the Bible does not command a Christian to keep a Sabbath, it is in our hearts to set apart a day, sanctifying it for worship and reflection. A person who feels inclined to work seven days a week should examine what god he or she worships.